The Effect of Auditor Competence, Independence and Professional Skepticism of Auditors on the Audit Quality
Abstract
This study aims to examine the effect of the competence, independence, and professional skepticism of auditors on the quality of audit results at the Inspectorate Office of South Sulawesi Province. The data in this study were obtained from auditors working at the Inspectorate Office of South Sulawesi Province who were willing to become respondents.This study uses primary data by conducting direct research in the field by providing questionnaires/statement sheets to 48 respondents. The data analysis method used is multiple linear regression analysis.The results showed that the competence, independence, and professional skepticism of auditors had a positive and significant effect on the quality of audit results.
Downloads
References
Alim, M. N., Hapsari, T., & Purwanti, L. (2007). Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Independensi terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Etika Auditor sebagai Variabel Moderasi. SNA X Makassar.
Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Mark, B. (2012). Auditing and assurance services: an integrated approach. Boston: Prentice Hall.
Bambang, S., & Indriantoro, N. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian dan Bisnis. Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi UGM. Yogyakarta.
Burhanudin, M. A., & Rahmawati, D. (2017). Pengaruh akuntabilitas dan independensi auditor terhadap kualitas audit pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Profita, 1-12.
Boynton, W. C., Johnson, R. N., & Kell, W. G. (2001). Modern auditing. J. Wiley & Sons.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of accounting and economics, 3(3), 183-199.
Elfarini, E. C. (2007). Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Independensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Jawa Tengah). Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Falatah, H. F., & Sukirno, S. (2018). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi dan Moral Reasoning Auditor terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi pada Kantor Inspektorat Daerah Di Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Nominal: Barometer Riset Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 7(1), 82-95.
Gusti, Maghfirah dan Ali, Syahril. 2008. Hubungan Skeptisme Profesional Auditor dan Situasi Audit, Etika, Pengalaman serta Keahlian Audit dengan ketepatan Pemberian Opini Auditor oleh Akuntan Publik. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XI.Pontianak.
Ghozali, I. (2009). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS; Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS, 19.
Herliansyah, Y., & Ilyas, M. (2006). Pengaruh pengalaman auditor terhadap penggunaan bukti tidak relevan dalam auditor judgment. SNA 9 Padang, 23-26.
Januarti, I., & Rr, K. S. (2011). Pengaruh Pengalaman, keahlian, situasi audit, etika dan gender terhadap ketepatan pemberian opini auditor melalui skeptisme profesional auditor. Journal Sistem Informatika, Etika dan Auditing. Hal, 1-12.
Kee, H. W., & Knox, R. E. (1970). Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion. Journal of conflict resolution, 14(3), 357-366.
Munawir, H. S. (1999). Auditing Modern. Yogyakarta: BPEE Yogyakarta.
Muslim, M., Ahmad, H., Rahim, S., & ARPelu, M. F. (2020). Client Pressures, Audit Tenure to Audit Quality: Moderation of Auditor Independence. Journal Of Auditing, Finance, And Forensic Accounting, 8(2), 67-75.
Muslim, M., Rahim, S., Pelu, M. F. A., & Pratiwi, A. (2020). Kualitas Audit: Ditinjau dari Fee Audit, Risiko Audit dan Skeptisme Profesional Auditor sebagai Variabel Moderating. Ekuitas: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 8(1), 9-19.
Noviyanti, S. (2008). Skeptisme profesional auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 5(1), 102-125.
Indonesia, R. Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor: Per/02. Menpan/2/2008 tentang Jabatan Fungsional Penyuluh Pertanian dan Angka Kreditnya.
Publik, I. A. I. K. A. (2001). Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Rahim, S., Ahmad, H., Nurwakia, N., Nurfadila, N., & Muslim, M. (2020). The Influence of Audit Staff Quality and Client Type on Audit Evidence Collection with Communication Type as Moderation. Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 3(1), 103-117.
Simanjuntak, P. (2008). Pengaruh Time Budget Pressure Dan Resiko Kesalahan Terhadap Penurunan Kualitas Audit (Reduced Audit Qaulity)(Studi Empiris Pada Auditor Kap Di Jakarta) (Doctoral dissertation, Program Sarjana Universitas Diponegoro).
Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, P. S. M. (2008). Competence at Work models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons.
Sawyer, L. B., Dittenhofer, M. A., & Scheiner, J. H. (2005). Audit internal sawyer. Edisi Kelima, Jilid Satu, Salemba Empat: Jakarta.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Surianti, S. (2021). The impact of audit independence, professionalism and scope of work on good corporate governance Implementation. Point of View Research Accounting and Auditing, 2(1), 109-121.
Ulum, I. (2009). Audit Sektor Publik Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Copyright (c) 2021 Point of View Research Accounting and Auditing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.