The Effect of the Fraud Triangle on Academic Fraud in Accounting Students

  • Nurhidayah Nurhidayah Univesrsitas Sulawesi Barat
  • Riana Anggraeny Ridwan Universitas Sulawesi Barat
Keywords: Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, Academic Fraud

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of pressure, opportunity, and rationalization on academic fraud in accounting students at the University of West Sulawesi. The population in this study consisted of 462 accounting students, and the sample in this study consisted of 82 respondents with the sampling process carried out by the Slovin method. The data collection method in this research is using a questionnaire, and the data analysis method used is multiple regression analysis with the stages of testing to be carried out, namely descriptive statistical tests, data quality tests consisting of (validity test, reliability test), assumption test definitive test consisting of (normality test, multicollinearity test, heteroscedasticity test) and hypothesis testing which was carried out through partial regression test (t-test) and simultaneous test (F-test). This study indicates that simultaneously, pressure, opportunity, and rationalization together have a positive and significant effect on academic fraud in accounting students at the University of West Sulawesi. However, partially, pressure has no insignificant impact on the academic fraud of accounting students at the University of West Sulawesi. In contrast, opportunity and rationalization positively and significantly affect academic fraud in accounting students at the University of West Sulawesi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, H., Hajering, H., Muslim, M., & Pratiwi, A. (2020). Pengaruh Tekanan Anggaran Waktu Dan Fee Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dimoderasi Kecerdasan Emosional. Widya Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 2(2), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.32795/widyaakuntansi.v2i2.907

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud Examination (Fourth Edi). Usa: South-Western.

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2018). Fraud Examination. Cengage Learning.

Anderman, E. M., & Murdock, T. B. (2007). Psychology Of Academic Fraud. Ebook. Elseiver Academic Press. Www. Gbv. De/Dms/Mpib-Toc/513809740. Pdf.

Apriani, N., Edy Sujana, S. E., & Sulindawati, N. L. G. E. (2017). Pengaruh Pressure, Opportunity, Dan Rationalization Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Empiris: Mahasiswa Akuntansi Program S1 Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha). Jimat (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha, 7(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jimat.v7i1.9490

Aulia, F. (2017). Faktor-Faktor Yang Terkait Dengan Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Rap (Riset Aktual Psikologi Universitas Negeri Padang), 6(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.24036/rapun.v6i1.6647

Budiman, N. A. (2018). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa: Dimensi Fraud Diamond Dan Gone Theory. Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 11(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v11i1.8807

Connolly, J., Lentz, P., & Morrison, J. (2006). Using The Business Fraud Triangle to Predict Academic Dishonesty Among Business Students. Academy Of Educational Leadership Journal, 10(1), 37. https://www.proquest.com/openview/3d7dae5af62b010d3f002d2de4dc4841/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=38741

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People’s Money; A Study of The Social Psychology of Embezzlement.

Hariri, H., Pradana, A. W. S., & Rahman, F. (2018). Mendeteksi Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Dengan Perspektif Fraud Diamond Theory. Ju-Ke (Jurnal Ketahanan Pangan), 2(1), 1–11. http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/JU-ke/article/view/1045

Hendricks, B. (2004). Academic Dishonesty: A Study in The Magnitude Of And Justifications For Academic Dishonesty Among College Undergraduate And Graduate Students. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/1160/

Irawati, I. (2008). Budaya Menyontek Di Kalangan Pelajar. Online) (Http://Kabarindonesia. Com/Berita. Php,).

Josephson, M., & Mertz, M. (2004). Changing Cheaters: Promoting Integrity and Preventing Academic Dishonesty–A Resource For Teachers, Parents, Coaches And Others Who Work With Youth. Josephson Institute of Ethics.

Muslim, M., Nurwanah, A., Sari, R., & Arsyad, M. (2020). Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Independensi, Integritas, Kompetensi Dan Etika Auditor Kualitas Audit. Wacana Equiliberium (Jurnal Pemikiran Penelitian Ekonomi), 8(2), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.31102/equilibrium.8.2.100-112

Munirah, A., & Nurkhin, A. (2018). Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Fraud Diamond Dan Gone Theory Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 7(1), 120–139. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eeaj/article/view/22862

Nurharjanti, N. N. (2017). Persepsi Mahasiswa Dalam Mengurangi Fraud Akademik: Whistleblowing Sistem. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 17(1), 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jab.v17i1.218

Nursani, R., & Irianto, G. (2013). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa: Dimensi Fraud Diamond. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Feb, 2(2). https://jimfeb.ub.ac.id/index.php/jimfeb/article/view/1262

Padmayanti, K. D., Edy Sujana, S. E., Kurniawan, P. S., & St, M. A. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Penerima Bidikmisi Jurusan Akuntansi S1 Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha). Jimat (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha, 8(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jimat.v8i2.13169

Pamungkas, M. G. (2018). Pengaruh Pressure, Opportunity, Dan Rationalization Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Empiris Pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Islam Indonesia). https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/12267

Rifaldi, T. (2020). Pengaruh Fraud Diamond Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik. Stie Perbanas Surabaya. http://eprints.perbanas.ac.id/id/eprint/7483

Sihombing, M., & Budiartha, I. K. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Triangle Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik (Academic Fraud) Mahasiswa Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(2), 361. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/download/54549/33665

Sugono, D. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Pusat Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Su’un, M., Hajering., & Muslim, M. (2020). Professional commitment and locus of control toward intensity in whistleblowing through ethical sensitivity. Jurnal Akuntansi, 24(1), 100-118.

Tuanakotta, T. M. (2007). Akuntansi Forensik Dan Audit Investigatif. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Widarti. (2015). Pengaruh Fraud Triangle Terhadap Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efekindonesia (Bei). Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis Sriwijaya, 13(2), 229–244. https://dx.doi.org/10.29259/jmbs.v13i2.3351

Published
2022-04-14
How to Cite
Nurhidayah, N., & Ridwan, R. A. (2022). The Effect of the Fraud Triangle on Academic Fraud in Accounting Students. Point of View Research Accounting and Auditing, 3(2), 119 - 133. https://doi.org/10.47090/povraa.v3i2.190
Section
Articles